Cite this as
Abbasi MT, Asghar MR, Bashir K, Hashmi MN (2021) Hyperuricemia in Renal patients: Treat or not to treat. Arch Clin Nephrol 7(1): 050-056. DOI: 10.17352/acn.000056Hyperuricemia management in chronic kidney disease is a challenging task. We encounter this dilemma on regular basis. Kidney disease patients have wide range (CKD population, Hemodialysis & peritoneal dialysis cohort and renal transplant patients).
In clinical practice wide range of opinions exists. This dubious area intrigued us to look into it. Looking into available published data majority of studies are observational and few are randomized control trials. All studies favor that high uric acid level has accelerated effect on CKD progression. Controversy is on its management, whether by treating it we are able to slow down CKD progression or not. Data supports that CKD progression is not slowed down but needs more studies to give conclusive answer. In dialysis and renal transplant patients studies showed inverse relationship of high uric levels with all-cause mortality. However, in peritoneal dialysis data suggests linear relationship of hyperuricemia with mortality.
A pro as well as anti-oxidant effect of uric acid has been discussed in literature. Variable cut off for hyperuricemia has been used but more census is on 7 mg/dl. Symptomatic gout definitely needs uric acid lowering therapy but in asymptomatic hyperuricemia no conclusion so far. There is paucity of data in maintenance dialysis and renal transplant patients.
CKD: Chronic Kidney Disease; GFR: Glomerular Filtration Rate; ESRD: End Stage Renal Disease; RAAS: Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System; KDIGO: Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome; PERL: Preventing Early Renal Loss; CKD-FIX: Slowing of Kidney Disease Progression from the Inhibition of Xanthine Oxidase; NSAID`s: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs; Focus: Febuxostat Open-Label Trial of Urate Lowering Efficacy and Safety.
Uric acid is a breakdown product of purine metabolism. It was about two centuries ago when uric acid was first identified. For a long time, hyperuricemia and gout were considered two names of a single entity but with the passage of time, it is quite evident that hyperuricemia has a vast spectrum of metabolic and clinical presentations [1]. It can result either due to overproduction or reduced excretion of uric acid [2]. It is still indecisive that hyperuricemia has a protective or causative role in degenerative disorders of nervous system and renal as well as and cardiovascular illnesses [3]. Hyperuricemia is prevalent worldwide including both developed and under-developed countries [4]. Data of National Health and Nutrition examination survey of 2007 to 2016 shows 20% prevalence of hyperuricemia in US population.
Hyperuricemia is a frequent finding in Chronic Kidney Disease patients (CKD). Reduced Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) is responsible for reduced excretion of uric acid. Prevalence of hyperuricemia in advanced CKD patients is 60% [5,6]. Hyperuricemia and CKD have a strong correlation but details are still controversial. Previously, monsodium urate crystals were assumed to be a factor in pathogenesis of CKD [7]. However, recent literature highlights a direct involvement of soluble serum urate in pathogenesis and progression of CKD [7,8].
Literature review shows an inverse relationship between high uric acid levels and mortality in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis [9]. Low uric acid levels were found to be associated with low all cause and cardiovascular mortality. However, in peritoneal dialysis patients, few studies have found a direct relationship of hyperuricemia with increased mortality but others have found no significant association [10]. Increased uric acid levels are also frequently observed in early post-transplant period. Although, there is an evidence of inverse association between hyperuricemia with mortality in transplant recipients but it is still inconclusive to establish a beneficial effect of treating asymptomatic hyperuricemia in this population [11].
There has been much debate about normal levels of uric acid so the definition of hyperuricemia is variably presented in literature. Practically, the definition of hyperuricemia is based on solubility of uric acid at physiological pH. Some studies have labelled hyperuricemia beyond a cut-off value >7mg/dl in males and >6mg/dl in females [12]. Another study by Desideri G, et al. defined uric acid levels above 6mg/dl as hyperuricemia [13]. Physiochemical definition of hyperuricemia seems logical and corresponds to uric acid levels beyond 7md/dl. Above this level, uric acid precipitates and may cause symptoms.
This review article is aimed to explore certain unanswered questions about impact of hyperuricemia on progression of CKD including dialysis and transplant patients.
Endogenous and exogenous purines are the sources of uric acid. Metabolism of purines mainly occurs in liver but some other tissues (intestines) which have xanthine oxidase enzyme activity, can also metabolize purines [14]. Uric acid is formed as end product of this metabolism. In animals, uric acid is further converted to allantoin by the activity of enzyme uricase [15]. Almost 2/3rd of the uric acid is excreted by kidneys and remaining 1/3rd by intestines [Figure 1]. In kidneys, filtration and secretion of uric acid are simultaneously carried out and 90% of the uric acid is ultimately reabsorbed.
Anti-oxidant activity of uric acid plays a fundamental role in tissue healing by initiating inflammatory cascade. Another basic function of uric acid is to remove nitrogenous wastes from body. Apart from these beneficial effects, uric acid has been found to be an independent predictor of increased cardiovascular mortality and also causes insulin resistance by increased production of oxygen species [10,16].
Data has analyzed a contributing role of different transporter genes including SLC2A9, SLC22A12, and ABCG2 in hyperuricemia and increased urate excretion. ABCG2 gene was found to be a highest risk factor for gout. Dysfunction of ABCG2 gene has been highlighted as a strong predictor of either under excretion or over excretion of uric acid [17]. Alcohol consumption has remained a topic of discussion due to its association with hypertension. However, it is now surprising to know that increased uric acid level is an independent risk factor of hypertension. A study by Tatsumi Y, et al. is a breakthrough in establishing its role as an independent risk after excluding the effect of alcohol consumption [18].
Uric acid levels are indirectly proportional to decline in renal functions. Decreased excretion of uric acid at the expense of reduced GFR in CKD patients is the main reason of hyperuricemia.
Increased uric acid levels have a profound effect in new onset as well as in progression of pre-existing CKD. Almost 40% of CKD stage I-III patients have hyperuricemia while it is seen in 70% of CKD stage-IV and V patients [19]. The beneficial effects of treating hyperuricemia in CKD are still debatable. Various mechanisms of hyperuricemia induced renal damage have been discussed in literature [Figure 2]. Schlee S, et al. explained role of monosodium urate crystals deposition in renal tubules leading to tubular cast formation and obstructive nephropathy [20].
Apart from beneficial effects of anti-oxidant activity, uric acid also has a pro-oxidant effect once it is incorporated into renal cells. The resulting oxidative stress provokes free radical mediated DNA damage and apoptosis [21]. Uric acid up-regulates Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) and resulting endothelial damage due to RAAS activation is another mechanism of decline in GFR [22].
Fan S, et al. compiled data of about 1700 renal biopsies and evaluated correlation of biopsy findings with uric acid levels. It was quite surprising that hyperuricemia was strongly associated with segmental sclerosis, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy [23]. Another pattern of renal injury caused by hyperuricemia is glomerulosclerosis. Artherosclerosis of renal vessels and glomerular hypertension are the logical etiologies of glomerulosclerosis as explained by Richard J, et al. [24]. Hyperuricemia is also predominantly involved in inflammatory damage to renal parenchymal cells. Deposition of monosodium urate crystals has been found to mediate this process [25].
Hyperuricemia is a modifiable risk factor for CKD and owing to this fact, lots of efforts regarding dietry modifications and treatment strategies are in practice. Studies have documented a role of uric acid in development of incident CKD. Striking data by Zhu P, et al. have found a strong association of hyperuricemia and incident CKD in middle aged population irrespective of other metabolic risk factors [26].
There is no convincing data about when and how to treat hyperuricemia in CKD as well as dialysis and transplant recipients. Multiple observational studies have found a causative role of hyperuricemia in CKD progression. Srivastava, et al. recently established uric acid as an independent risk factor for renal failure in patients with early CKD but whether uric acid lowering strategies can help in retarding this progression remained inconclusive [27]. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) guidelines have no strong recommendation for treating hyperuricemia in CKD population due to lack of consensus. These guidelines do not even confirm the role of hyperuricemia treatment in slowing progression of kidney disease [28].
Recently, a randomized controlled trial, Preventing Early Renal Loss (PERL trial) in type-I diabetic patients is a breakthrough in evaluating the impact of treating hyperuricemia in kidney diseases [29]. A total number of 267 patients were given allopurinol and were compared with 263 patients who were given placebo. Although, uric acid levels were effectively lowered but it was not found to lower the risk of disease progression. Another randomized controlled trial of Slowing of Kidney Disease Progression from the Inhibition of Xanthine Oxidase (CKD-FIX), published in New England journal of medicine also came out with similar results [30]. 185 patients received allopurinol as uric acid lowering treatment and were compared with 184 patients who received placebo. Again, the treatment was effective as uric acid lowering strategy but did not show any impact in slowing progression of disease. PERL and CKD-FIX trials are based on strong recommendations about the impact of treating high uric acid levels and its effect on disease severity.
Uric acid is also responsible for endothelial dysfunction but treating hyperuricemia does not improve endothelial damage. The reality of this effect was established in a double blind controlled trial by Borgi L, et al. [31]. The available data to-date does not establish the role of treating hyperuricemia in effectively retarding progression of CKD. Further trials like PERL and CKD-FIX can help in providing a strong consensus about this fact.
Since the mechanism of hyperuricemia also includes under-excretion of uric acid so, uric acid levels are variably increased in different stages of CKD based on GFR. Till date, uric acid levels beyond 7mg/dl are considered as hyperuricemia irrespective of CKD presence or absence. There is lack of data about uric acid levels according to GFR. However, it is postulated that urate nephropathy can develop beyond certain cut-off values of serum creatinine [32]. Uric acid levels above 9mg/dl in patients with serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dl is high likely to cause urate nephropathy [Table 1].
A study by Qayyum M, et al. correlated high incidence of hyperuricemia in pre-dialysis CKD population with abnormal metabolic profile [33]. Although uric acid levels are gradually increased with decline in GFR but this increase is quite rapid in the presence of hyperlipidemia and smoking [34]. The maximum rise of uric acid levels is seen in patients with CKD stage 5 [Figure 3]. Further conclusive studies will be required to decide cut-off values for uric acid in different stage of CKD.
Patients requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, both are prone to develop hyperuricemia. Uric acid levels are variably reported in studies to define hyperuricemia in dialysis population. Mean uric acid levels above 7.5mg/dl in hemodialysis and above 8.5mg/dl in peritoneal dialysis patients are considered abnormal [35,36]. This variability is probably based on prescription of dialysis and timings of sample collection.
In patients with standard hemodialysis prescription, high flux dialyzer can remove almost 70% of uric acid and in PD, 15-20ml/min is removed based on peritoneal dialysate flow rate [37,38]. In a review article by Murea, et al. 9 out of 14 studies showed an inverse relationship of uric acid levels with all-cause mortality [14]. Rest of five studies found no association. This was a surprising finding because it was contrary to pre-dialysis CKD population. The same finding has also been reported by Latif, et al. [39]. Different theories have been suggested for this finding in HD patients. It was postulated that uric acid is a marker of better nutrition so a low uric acid level can lead to increased mortality. However this opinion was later rejected because mortality was not reduced even after correction of nutritional parameters [40].
Regarding PD patients, only two of these studies found direst relationship of uric acid levels with mortality. This demands further research to document the role of higher uric acid levels in decreasing cardiovascular mortality.
Removal of uric acid in dialysate has a linear relationship with urea. Immediately after dialysis, uric acid levels will be markedly low compared to pre-dialysis levels. Therefore, timings of sample collection is important to explain the effect of dialysis on uric acid levels. Mean uric acid levels will be high between two dialysis sessions. Patients with high pre-dialysis uric acid levels may have normal levels after dialysis which are sufficient to carry out anti-oxidant activity. This is another explanation of protective effect of hyperuricemia in HD patients [10].
Hyperuricemia is commonly observed in early post-transplant period and can precipitate gout [41]. Cyclosporine has been found to have a significant role in hyperuricemia in transplant recipients. Almost 84% of patients treated with cyclosporine develop hyperuricemia while azathioprine and corticosteroids are responsible in 34% of cases [42]. Other possible causes include use of diuretics, acute tubular necrosis and episodes of graft rejection [43].
Effect of hyperuricemia on renal allograft has not been studied in detail and available data also remains inconclusive in evaluating its association [44]. Some studies have documented an inverse relationship of uric acid levels with graft function while other studies failed to find any association [45,46].
Treatment of hyperuricemia and associated gouty attacks is not free of risks in transplant recipients. So, there is no current recommendation of its treatment and available literature also has conflicting results. However, it is proposed that management of modifiable risk factors including smoking and weight reduction is mandatory and if there is no response, dose reduction or complete avoidance of cyclosporine with suitable alternate option should be adopted [47].
There is no sufficient data available to-date about effective role of treating hyperuricemia in chronic kidney disease. Most of the studies including recently published PERL and CKD-FIX trials have clearly documented no impact of lowering UA on CKD progression. However, efforts are routinely carried out to reduce UA levels in view of reducing associated cardiovascular mortality. In such conditions, treatment of hyperuricemia is considered an adjunct strategy in addition to definite management of co-morbid conditions [48].
Life-style modification is almost equally effective to drug treatment in management of hyperuricemia but has a limited impact on progression of kidney disease. There is no convincing data recommending non-pharmacological management as an effective option. In CKD patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia, there is no role of pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. However, following life style changes are recommended to reduce hyperuricemia associated risk factors other than kidney disease:
• Reduction in purine rich diet
• Weight reduction with modest increase in daily exercise (7kg weight loss can result in 1.5mg/dl decline in uric acid levels) [49].
• Decreased alcohol consumption
• Limited use of drugs causing hyperuricemia like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID`s), thiazide diuretics, beta blockers.
There are three main classes of drugs including xanthine oxidase inhibitors, uricosuric drugs and recombinant uricase for treatment of hyperuricemia.
Allopurinol is metabolized to oxypurinol which inhibits enzyme xanthine oxidase thus limiting the conversion of xanthine to uric acid. Febuxostat is a non-purine xanthine oxidase inhibitor. Both of these drugs do not disrupt synthesis of vital purines. Previous data about use of allopurinol suggests its efficacy in retarding progression of CKD as mentioned in a trial by Goicoechea, et al. in 2010 [50]. Another trial by Kao, et al. came out with the same results [51]. It has also been debated in literature that stopping allopurinol can provoke renal dysfunction in CKD patients who are already taking this medicine [52]. These trials had a small sample size but the results strongly recommended the use of allopurinol in CKD population. However, no significant improvement was reported in blood pressure and cardiovascular mortality.
Allopurinol needs dose adjustment in CKD patients based on GFR because it has renal excretion. Stevens-Johnson syndrome is a life-threatening side effect of allopurinol and is another major reason in reducing its dose. In order to minimize the risk of allergic reactions, starting dose of allopurinol should be 1.5 times the GFR. If the dose is tolerated for next eight weeks, then it can be increased till target UA level of 7mg/dl or below is achieved. It should be avoided in transplant recipients taking azathioprine because conversion of 6 mercaptopurine to thiouric acid is catalyzed by enzyme xanthine oxidase. Inhibition of this enzyme by allopurinol will result in accumulation of 6 mercaptopurine causing azathioprine toxicity.
Febuxostat is more effective than allopurinol in inhibition of xanthine oxidase. Its excretion is through bile so no dose reduction is required in CKD patients. Focus trial (febuxostat open-label trial of Urate lowering efficacy and safety) showed a clear benefit of febuxostat in improving GFR [53]. Another study compared efficacy of febuxostat vs. allopurinol in 1086 CKD patients. The results of this study were also in favor of febuxostat in terms of GFR improvement [54]. Despite these results, a recent randomized trial by Kimura K, et al. reported no benefit of febuxostat in improvement of renal functions in CKD patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia [55]. Some studies have also reported increased mortality associated with febuxostat use in cardiac patients and do not suggest it as first line uric acid lowering therapy [56]. There are very few studies about febuxostat use in dialysis population so US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved its use in these patients.
Probenecid, sulfinpyrazone and benzbromarone increase uric acid excretion and are very effective as uric acid lowering agents in patients with normal renal functions. However, they are not approved for CKD patients and those with previous history of nephrolithiasis [57]. Sulfinpyrazone has documented interactions with cyclosporine and lowers its trough levels in transplant recipients. So, cyclosporine levels need close monitoring and dose adjustment accordingly.
Benzbromarone is also an effective first line uric acid lowering drug in patients with HLA-B*5801 allele. This allele is more prevalent in Asian population and these patients are prone to allopurinol toxicity [58]. Its use is also limited due to its hepatotoxic effects. Some other drugs including losartan, vitamin C and fenofibrates also have uricosuric properties but their use is confined to other systemic conditions [57]. Canakinumab is an interlekin-1 inhibitor and has been approved by European Union for the treatment of hyperuricemia and acute gout in patients with normal renal functions. In CKD and transplant patients, they still have an investigational role and are not approved so far.
Pegloticase and rasburicase are recombinant uricase which are recently approved for treatment of symptomatic gout. It converts uric acid to a more soluble product, allantoin. It is given intravenously on alternate weeks in patients who are not responding to oral uric acid lowering medications. It can be given to CKD, dialysis and transplant patients [57]. Rasburicase is also being used in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy who are at risk of tumor lysis syndrome [59].
The relationship of hyperuricemia and decline in renal functions has been established in most of the observational studies. The mechanisms involved in pathogenesis of CKD have also been proposed in literature but there is no conclusive evidence so far. Treatment of symptomatic gout is required with uric acid lowering therapy in CKD patients but there are no current recommendation to treat asymptomatic hyperuricemia in this population. There is paucity of data in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis and in transplant recipients. Large randomized controlled trials are mandatory to develop a consensus approach in establishing a definite mechanism of hyperuricemia in disease progression and efficacy of its treatment in improving renal functions.
Subscribe to our articles alerts and stay tuned.
PTZ: We're glad you're here. Please click "create a new query" if you are a new visitor to our website and need further information from us.
If you are already a member of our network and need to keep track of any developments regarding a question you have already submitted, click "take me to my Query."